Performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and Omicron BA.1 antibody assays compared with pseudovirus neutralization tests.

BACKGROUND: Commercially available ELISA-based antibody tests are used to approximate vaccination success against SARS-CoV-2 in at-risk patients, but it is unclear whether they correlate with neutralization of the Omicron variant. METHODS: 269 serum samples of a cohort of 44 non-immunosuppressed participants and 65 MTX-treated rheumatic patients taken before and after COVID-19 booster vaccinations were measured using COVID-19 antibody testing systems with wild-type and Omicron BA.1 antigens developed by three different manufacturers (surrogate virus neutralization test cPass, and binding antibody tests QuantiVac and SeraSpot), as well as with a pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT). The pVNT was considered the gold standard for determining the presence and level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: All three wild-type ELISAs showed excellent test performance compared with wild-type neutralization in pVNT. However, out of 56 samples without Omicron BA.1 neutralization in pVNT, 71.4% showed positive results in at least one and 28.6% in all three wild-type ELISAs at the manufacturer-defined cut-offs. Omicron ELISAs showed either decreased specificity (57.1% and 55.4% for binding ELISAs) or sensitivity (51.2% in cPass) compared to Omicron neutralization in pVNT. The proportion of any false positive results among all samples decreased from 26.5% before to 3.2% after booster vaccination, however binding antibody test specificities remained below 70%. CONCLUSIONS: We found a poorer test performance of new Omicron antibody test systems compared to wild-type tests in detecting neutralizing antibodies against the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 variants. Decisions for booster vaccination or passive immunization of at-risk patients should not be based solely on antibody test results.

Single cell mRNA sequencing of nasal swabs indicate an impaired ciliated cell function in COVID-19 convalescents with persisting dyspnea

COVID-19 convalescents often experience persistent symptoms such as fatigue, neurologic complications or dyspnea, often referred to as "long COVID". To elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying ongoing dyspnea in COVID-19 convalescents, we analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing data from nasal swabs collected during acute infection, and three, six and twelve months post infection together with matching healthy controls. Patients with and without persisting symptoms and with varying severity during the acute phase were included. Post infection, we observed a time-dependent decrease in immune cells. Transcriptional analysis of nasal epithelial cells provided evidence of an impaired cilia assembly, organization and function in COVID-19 convalescents with dyspnea compared to healthy controls and convalescents without ongoing respiratory symptoms. Moreover, differences in the differentiation trajectories of ciliated cells were evident between patients with and without dyspnea, with less diverse differentiation endpoints in the dyspnea patients than in healthy controls or convalescents without respiratory impairment. Overall, our analyses revealed a potential deficiency of ciliated cells in COVID-19 convalescents with dyspnea compared to convalescents without ongoing respiratory symptoms or compared with healthy controls. Ciliated cells clear the lung from particles and mucus. If these cells are functionally impaired, pathogens remain in the airways, causing respiratory problems and infections. Thus, it is reasonable to assume, that impaired ciliated cell function contributes to the persistent respiratory symptoms seen in COVID-19 convalescents.

Working from Home in the COVID-19 Pandemic - Which Technological and Social Factors Influence the Working Conditions and Job Satisfaction of People with Disabilities?

Objective: The project aims to determine the technological and social factors, which promote or hinder work success and job satisfaction of people with disabilities in home office situations. Methods: A mixed-methods approach (online survey and expert interviews) with 13 participants with disabilities from different fields of university work was chosen. Results: People with disabilities face significantly greater challenges in home office work than people without disabilities;lack of ergonomic equipment, non-accessible technologies, and difficulties in communicating and interacting with colleagues and superiors result in negative impacts on work processes and job satisfaction. Conclusion: The outcomes of the presented research are a first approach to survey and evaluate the conditions and effects of home office work for people with disabilities. Further studies are needed to explore different areas of work and different types of disabilities in greater depth. © 2022, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Complement activation induces excessive T cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19

Severe COVID-19 is linked to both dysfunctional immune response and unrestrained immunopathology, and it remains unclear whether T cells contribute to disease pathology. Here, we combined single-cell transcriptomics and single-cell proteomics with mechanistic studies to assess pathogenic T cell functions and inducing signals. We identified highly activated CD16(+) T cells with increased cytotoxic functions in severe COVID-19. CD16 expression enabled immune-complex-mediated, T cell receptor-independent degranulation and cytotoxicity not found in other diseases. CD16(+) T cells from COVID-19 patients promoted microvascular endothelial cell injury and release of neutrophil and monocyte chemoattractants. CD16(+) T cell clones persisted beyond acute disease maintaining their cytotoxic phenotype. Increased generation of C3a in severe COVID-19 induced activated CD16(+) cytotoxic T cells. Proportions of activated CD16(+) T cells and plasma levels of complement proteins upstream of C3a were associated with fatal outcome of COVID-19, supporting a pathological role of exacerbated cytotoxicity and complement activation in COVID-19.

Long-term health sequelae and quality of life at least 6 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2: design and rationale of the COVIDOM-study as part of the NAPKON population-based cohort platform (POP).

PURPOSE: Over the course of COVID-19 pandemic, evidence has accumulated that SARS-CoV-2 infections may affect multiple organs and have serious clinical sequelae, but on-site clinical examinations with non-hospitalized samples are rare. We, therefore, aimed to systematically assess the long-term health status of samples of hospitalized and non-hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals from three regions in Germany. METHODS: The present paper describes the COVIDOM-study within the population-based cohort platform (POP) which has been established under the auspices of the NAPKON infrastructure (German National Pandemic Cohort Network) of the national Network University Medicine (NUM). Comprehensive health assessments among SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are conducted at least 6 months after the acute infection at the study sites Kiel, Würzburg and Berlin. Potential participants were identified and contacted via the local public health authorities, irrespective of the severity of the initial infection. A harmonized examination protocol has been implemented, consisting of detailed assessments of medical history, physical examinations, and the collection of multiple biosamples (e.g., serum, plasma, saliva, urine) for future analyses. In addition, patient-reported perception of the impact of local pandemic-related measures and infection on quality-of-life are obtained. RESULTS: As of July 2021, in total 6813 individuals infected in 2020 have been invited into the COVIDOM-study. Of these, about 36% wished to participate and 1295 have already been examined at least once. CONCLUSION: NAPKON-POP COVIDOM-study complements other Long COVID studies assessing the long-term consequences of an infection with SARS-CoV-2 by providing detailed health data of population-based samples, including individuals with various degrees of disease severity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at the German registry for clinical studies (DRKS00023742).